Juergen Hoeller opened SPR-12847 and commented
EhCache 3.0 lives in a different package namespace and has a quite different API from classic EhCache. Due to its redesign and repurposing as a JCache provider (which is built into EhCache 3.0 out of the box now), it's probably best to focus on compatibility with it as a provider behind Spring's JCache support. This means that there won't be an org.springframework.cache.ehcache equivalent for it.
This issue tracks our efforts to provide compatibility with it, optionally running parts of our test suite against it etc.
Issue Links:
Referenced from: commits 26d4f91
Juergen Hoeller opened SPR-12847 and commented
EhCache 3.0 lives in a different package namespace and has a quite different API from classic EhCache. Due to its redesign and repurposing as a JCache provider (which is built into EhCache 3.0 out of the box now), it's probably best to focus on compatibility with it as a provider behind Spring's JCache support. This means that there won't be an
org.springframework.cache.ehcacheequivalent for it.This issue tracks our efforts to provide compatibility with it, optionally running parts of our test suite against it etc.
Issue Links:
Referenced from: commits 26d4f91