[why-astro]#5428
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
dreyfus92
left a comment
dreyfus92
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was a huge revamp @sarah11918, amazing job. I left you a couple of suggestions and I would love to hear what you think.
| **Astro was designed for building content-rich websites.** This includes marketing sites, publishing sites, documentation sites, blogs, portfolios, landing pages, community sites, and ecommerce sites. If you have content to show, it needs to reach your reader quickly. | ||
|
|
||
| By contrast, most modern web frameworks are designed for building *web applications*. These frameworks work best for building more complex, application-like experiences in the browser: logged-in admin dashboards, inboxes, social networks, todo lists, and even native-like applications like [Figma](https://figma.com/) and [Ping](https://ping.gg/). | ||
| By contrast, most modern web frameworks were designed for building *web applications*. These frameworks excel at building more complex, application-like experiences in the browser: logged-in admin dashboards, inboxes, social networks, todo lists, and even native-like applications like [Figma](https://figma.com/) and [Ping](https://ping.gg/). However, they often struggle to provide great performance when you need it most. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The final sentence - However, they often struggle to provide ... most
Regular Astro Docs Reader POV: Its good 👍
Twitter Hot Take POV: I kinda feel bad reading it and I would not like it in my feed as well
I have never seen any Framework Docs mentioning how a certain third party product can struggle during times of need
Note: This is a subjective opinion and I don't think my suggestion here would make any difference for better but I want to just talk about it given Fred and Theo(ping.gg creator) have some good content over Youtube & Twitter afaik
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, let's try to avoid hot takes here! I do want a however, of some kind. Something that implies: if a thing was built for that stuff, then why would you expect it to excel at the other stuff? Does a change like... "However with that complexity, they CAN struggle to provide great performance when delivering your content." feel any different to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will follow up on this in next 8-10 hours (its midnight at my place)
From my PoV the PR is a big 👍 (GitHub Inbox going crazy already)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know how to mark a comment resolved in GitHub so I will just approve the PR for the better (will do that tomorrow for sure)
yanthomasdev
left a comment
yanthomasdev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is looking great, left a few comments.
Co-authored-by: Yan Thomas <61414485+Yan-Thomas@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Final remarks before Approving
Huge revamp 🥇, thanks to Yan and Dreyfus for making my job easier 👍 |
|
Talked with Sarah via Discord and committed my edits directly to the PR. Mainly focused on bringing the intro together into a concise, connected story: Love this new page, especially the new value around developer experience! |
FredKSchott
left a comment
FredKSchott
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! I can give a deeper read later this week to look for specific edits and suggestions if it would help, but also don't let me block / consider this my official +1!
Thanks for all of your work on this Sarah! Love the new section on developer experience!
* i18n(it): update why-astro.mdx The file `why-astro.mdx` has been updated to align with the English language documentation based on this commits #5428 * Fix links --------- Co-authored-by: Yan Thomas <61414485+Yan-Thomas@users.noreply.github.com>
5 participants
Description (required)
Revamped "Why Astro?" page after Sarah <> Fred messaging discussions.