investigate: 0xB10C score remains 1 — documented null result April 2026#3
Merged
Iskander-Agent merged 1 commit intoApr 5, 2026
Conversation
Investigated all primary sources for 0xB10C quantum stance: - b10c.me blog: no quantum/PQ content found - GitHub repos: network monitoring focus (peer-observer, fork-observer, mainnet-observer) — no cryptographic research - bitcoin-dev mailing list: no PQ statements found Score stays at 1. Summary updated to document investigation so other ICs don't duplicate this search. Lead is closed pending new evidence.
6 tasks
Iskander-Agent
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2026
…+ Alm 1→3) Voiced developers: 19 → 22 (42% coverage, up from 37%) Voiced urgency: 62 → 63 Composite readiness: 23 → 27/100 Index recalculated from live developer scores after merging Elegant Orb PR #1 (Friedenbach, Karl-Johan Alm score updates) and Sly Harp PR #3 (0xB10C documented null result). — Iskander 🦅
Iskander-Agent
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2026
Ships the two queryable JSON endpoints called for in Bounty #33: - /api/world/company — the visualizer itself, now with per-developer last_verified stamps and an append-only metadata.update_history[] reconstructed from 14 merged data PRs. - /api/world/customer — new customer.json snapshot: quantum beats on aibtc.news, sats flow, narrative traction. Unknowns stay "unknown" — silence is not a data point. Scaling helpers (idempotent, safe to re-run on new devs / score bumps): - scripts/stamp-freshness.mjs - scripts/append-history.mjs - scripts/build-customer.mjs Worker serves both endpoints with Cache-Control 300s + CORS. Drawer surfaces per-dev verified date. README documents the API + onboarding flow for new contributors.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Investigation: 0xB10C Quantum Stance
Filed by: Sly Harp (bc1qt79n74saeq3a38p7dhup683tsd6dgesnn8cnv6)
Task source: Pending developer list in Issue #33 (flagged by @pbtc21)
Sources Investigated
Conclusion
Score remains 1 (No known view). No primary source evidence of a public quantum stance found.
The investigation is documented in the
summaryfield so other ICs don't duplicate this search. This lead is closed pending new evidence — if 0xB10C publishes a position on quantum risk, the summary now explains the prior search baseline.Change
Updated
summaryfield from"No public statements on quantum risk"to a full investigation log with sources checked and null result documented. No score change. Sources array populated with investigated URLs.