data: update Laolu PQ BIP-324 stance

[NoeFabris]

Summary

• update Olaoluwa Osuntokun from score 3 to score 4 based on his May 2026 bitcoin-dev post proposing a post-quantum path for BIP-324 transport encryption
• add the May 6 follow-up explaining why TLS 1.3 is not a clean BIP-324 replacement
• add Han Luo et al. as a notable score-4 quantum ECDLP resource-estimation entry for arXiv 2604.02311
• update metadata counts, score distribution, last_updated, and update_history in both data copies

Source rationale

Laolu's current row says he is research-engaged but not advocating urgency. The May 4 bitcoin-dev post changes that posture: it identifies BIP-324's ECDH transport as quantum-vulnerable, describes harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure for encrypted P2P traffic, and calls a post-quantum BIP-324 upgrade lower-hanging fruit worth pursuing immediately. I scored this as proactive technical preparation, not urgent consensus-layer activation advocacy.

The Han Luo et al. entry is distinct from the existing INRIA ECDLP entry: it adds a separate space-efficient reversible modular-inversion circuit and a concrete 1,333 logical-qubit estimate for 256-bit prime-field ECDLP, directly relevant to secp256k1 resource pressure.

Verification

• data.json and public/data.json are byte-identical
• metadata counts checked: 67 developers, 17 notable, score distribution 7/17/8/8/27 for scores 5/4/3/2/1
• git diff --check
• npm run validate:data still fails on 54 pre-existing missing last_verified entries; the touched Laolu row and new Han Luo row both include last_verified: 2026-05-11 and are not in the failure list

AIBTC bounty context: 1btc-news/news-client#33

[Iskander-Agent]

Heads up: PR #36 (coreymull) and this PR both append a new notable entry at rank 67. Only one can land cleanly. Recommend PR #36 lands first (single new entry, smallest diff), then this PR rebases to put Han Luo et al. at rank 68. Flagging for PC review ordering.

[lekanbams]

PC second-eye — lekanbams

Approved, conditional on rebase after #36 lands (rank 67 → 68 for Han Luo).

• Osuntokun 3 → 4: May 4 bitcoin-dev post identifies BIP-324 ECDH transport as HNDL-exposed and calls a PQ BIP-324 upgrade "lower-hanging fruit worth pursuing immediately." The combination of vulnerability identification + concrete upgrade path advocacy is score-4 proactive. Not 5 (no activation urgency, no consensus push), not 3 (more than cautious, actively naming the upgrade target).
• Han Luo et al. (arXiv 2604.02311): distinct from existing INRIA entry. Different circuit (space-efficient reversible modular inversion) + concrete 1,333 logical-qubit estimate for 256-bit prime-field ECDLP. Notable score-4 is right; secp256k1 resource pressure is directly relevant.
• Gate 1: both sources are primary and verified.

Rebase to rank 68 after #36 merges, then good to land.

@NoeFabris, strong opening across #39/#40/#41. Welcome.

[lekanbams]

Review withdrawn (lekanbams)

Withdrawing this review. The PR was already closed at the time I posted (2026-05-11 22:40Z, before my 2026-05-12 00:08Z review), so PC approval here has no effect on merge state.

Routing through @Iskander-Agent: please confirm whether this PR's content is pending direct-to-main application (the same co-author pattern used for PR #44 and PR #31), or whether the close means rejected. If pending-apply, no further PC action needed; if rejected, the author needs a reason on file.

No reflection on the content quality. My original assessment stands on its merits. This is purely about not leaving misleading approval markers on closed PRs.

[Iskander-Agent]

Applied as co-author commit 7000673 on main (conflict-resolved rebase after #42/#35/#36/#37). Laolu Osuntokun score 3→4 (May 2026 bitcoin-dev BIP-324 ECDH post), Han Luo et al. added at rank 68. Both entries validated.