[aspnetcore] Feature/cleanup#2436
Conversation
* [dart] Fix authentication so all forms of Swagger 2.0 authentication work * Run changes on petstore examples * Amend dart2 generated README to cover basic authentication * Amend dart2 generated README to cover authentication methods * [dart] Fix authentication so all forms of Swagger 2.0 authentication work * Run changes on petstore examples
modules/openapi-generator/src/main/java/org/openapitools/codegen/CliOption.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
cc @jimschubert as this PR enhances the CliOption class. |
|
@A-Joshi thanks for the PR. Just a heads up that there's another project to add a ASP.NET core 3.0 generator: https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/projects/9 |
|
Thanks will reach out - it should be easy to add in the 3.0 support as a
folder and target to the current setup so we don't have yet another
almost the same generator
…On 3/19/19 9:48 AM, William Cheng wrote:
@A-Joshi <https://github.com/A-Joshi> thanks for the PR. Just a heads
up that there's another project to add a ASP.NET core 3.0 generator:
https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/projects/9
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2436 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANQEIS3a8j48pVZqsilUaQ6JnUJpKN_jks5vYOq6gaJpZM4b5tfg>.
|
* modify handing reserved keyword and set isEnum in local codegen to avoid conflict with other codegen * update README mustache * added object header and body mustache
|
I've not tried 3.0 myself. Is that very different when compared with the 2.x version? For other generators (e.g. Swift), we deal with major version upgrade with a new generator to make it easier to maintain. For ASP.NET CORE, I do not have a preference as I'm not familiar with the framework. |
|
So far the changes are mostly for performance and some thirdparty
packages have been removed. I'll reach out to see what would work best.
…On 3/19/19 10:50 AM, William Cheng wrote:
I've not tried 3.0 myself. Is that very different when compared with
the 2.x version?
For other generators (e.g. Swift), we deal with major version upgrade
with a new generator to make it easier to maintain.
For ASP.NET CORE, I do not have a preference as I'm not familiar with
the framework.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2436 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANQEIWSSRF2X9eKWDxeoy8aDHF3nbGgpks5vYPlLgaJpZM4b5tfg>.
|
|
Looks like a rebase fails and this PR now contains commits not authored by you. I wonder if you can create a new branch based on the latest master and cherry-pick your commits. |
|
Changes look good. I've rebased onto my own branch to evaluate only the changes related to this PR. Feel free to pull/branch off that and reopen a PR: https://github.com/jimschubert/openapi-generator/tree/ihsmarkitoss-feature/cleanup. Probably best to have @A-Joshi double-check just to make sure I didn't accidentally remove any intended work during the rebase. |
|
I'm closing this in favor of #2506, which is rebased against master and includes original contributor information during the rebase. |
|
Thanks have been traveling abroad will look as soon as I am back this week
…On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 3:42 AM Jim Schubert ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #2436 <#2436>
.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2436 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANQEIXK1fln0-tg_2FHdn9oPY-YRIjaIks5vaYj_gaJpZM4b5tfg>
.
|
PR checklist
./bin/to update Petstore sample so that CIs can verify the change. (For instance, only need to run./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh,./bin/openapi3/{LANG}-petstore.shif updating the {LANG} (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc) code generator or {LANG} client's mustache templates). Windows batch files can be found in.\bin\windows\.master,. Default:3.4.x,4.0.xmaster.Description of the PR
Mostly cosmetic code refactoring to make the code more readable - as per 2285