Skip to content

crypto-common v0.2#1172

Merged
newpavlov merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
crypto_common_v0.2
Dec 19, 2022
Merged

crypto-common v0.2#1172
newpavlov merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
crypto_common_v0.2

Conversation

@newpavlov
Copy link
Member

Added

  • Sealed BlockSizes trait implemented for types from U1 to U255

Changed

  • BlockUser::BlockSize is now bounded by the BlockSizes trait
  • Edition changed to 2021 and MSRV bumped to 1.56

@newpavlov newpavlov mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2022
@newpavlov
Copy link
Member Author

newpavlov commented Dec 19, 2022

Before doing the final crypto-common v0.2 release I think we should wait for rand_core v0.7, which probably should happen in the near future together with rand v0.9 release.

@newpavlov newpavlov merged commit cf9a83c into master Dec 19, 2022
@newpavlov newpavlov deleted the crypto_common_v0.2 branch December 19, 2022 17:11
@tarcieri tarcieri mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2026
newpavlov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2026
### Added
- Sealed `BlockSizes` trait implemented for types from `U1` to `U255`
([#1172])
- `SerializableState` trait under `hazmat` module ([#1369])
- `OutputSize` type alias ([#1533])
- `IvState` trait ([#1636])
- `core::error::Error` impls for error types ([#1660])
- `Generate` trait as a common RNG API ([#2096], [#2145])
- `TryKeyInit` trait ([#2097])
- Re-export `getrandom` ([#2152])
- `KeyExport` trait ([#2213])

### Changed
- Replaced `generic-array` with `hybrid-array` ([#1319], [#1976])
- `BlockUser::BlockSize` is now bounded by the `BlockSizes` trait
- Edition changed to 2024 and MSRV bumped to 1.85 ([#1759])
- `generate_*` methods on `KeyInit` and `KeyIvInit` traits have been
deprecated in favor of the
  new `Generate` trait ([#2162])
- Bump `rand_core` to v0.10 ([#2250])
- Bump `getrandom` to v0.4 ([#2258])

### Removed
- `std` feature ([#1680])

[#1172]: #1172
[#1319]: #1319
[#1369]: #1369
[#1533]: #1533
[#1636]: #1636
[#1660]: #1660
[#1680]: #1680
[#1759]: #1759
[#1976]: #1976
[#2096]: #2096
[#2097]: #2097
[#2145]: #2145
[#2152]: #2152
[#2162]: #2162
[#2213]: #2213
[#2250]: #2250
[#2258]: #2258
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants