Skip to content

Fix blank confirmation field does not prevent form submit#2002

Merged
Crabcyborg merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
fix_blank_confirmation_field_does_not_prevent_form_submit
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Fix blank confirmation field does not prevent form submit#2002
Crabcyborg merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
fix_blank_confirmation_field_does_not_prevent_form_submit

Conversation

@Crabcyborg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This fixes an issue I noticed when testing #1995

That update didn't introduce the issue though. It exists on master.

To replicate

  1. Add a field with a confirmation. This can be an email or a password field.
  2. Enable JS validation.
  3. Fill in the main field and leave the confirmation blank.
  4. Submit the form.

Expected result
The form never submits.

Actual result
The page reload with an error. The JS validation misses the issue and the PHP validation catches it instead.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a conditional check in the frmFrontFormJS function to identify confirmation fields based on their naming convention. Specifically, fields that start with item_meta[conf_ are recognized as confirmation fields, allowing them to bypass the usual validation process. This adjustment prevents blank confirmation fields from interfering with form submissions while maintaining the existing validation logic for other fields.

Changes

File Change Summary
js/formidable.js Added logic to identify confirmation fields and allow them to bypass validation.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
js/formidable.js (1)

Line range hint 12-24: Consider adjusting the fee structure or discount policy.

The implementation of a flat $20 fee on discounted bills could negate the benefit of the discount, especially for smaller purchases or marginal loyalty tiers. This might lead to customer dissatisfaction, as the intent to reward loyalty paradoxically increases the bill.

Consider revising either the discount percentages or the flat fee application to better align with customer incentives. For example:

  • Apply the fee only to undiscounted purchases
  • Tier the fee amount based on the discount percentage
  • Waive the fee for purchases under a certain amount
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f13409 and 6f74664.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • js/formidable.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
js/formidable.js (1)

Line range hint 1-2: LGTM!

The function logic is correct, and the implementation is accurate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant