Stop using jQuery for required field validation#2109
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
js/formidable.js (2)
175-177: Consider enhancing visibility check for edge cases.While
offsetParent !== nullworks for most cases, it might not catch all visibility scenarios (e.g., elements withvisibility: hidden). Consider using a more comprehensive visibility check.-const isVisible = requiredField.offsetParent !== null; +const isVisible = (field) => { + const style = window.getComputedStyle(field); + return !!(field.offsetParent !== null && + style.display !== 'none' && + style.visibility !== 'hidden'); +};
180-189: Consider optimizing nested querySelectorAll calls.The nested
querySelectorAllcalls inside a loop could impact performance with large forms. Consider combining the selectors.-requiredField.querySelectorAll('input, select, textarea').forEach( +const inputs = requiredField.querySelectorAll('input:not(.frm_optional):not(.ed_button), select:not(.frm_optional), textarea:not(.frm_optional)'); +inputs.forEach( requiredInput => { - if (hasClass(requiredInput, 'frm_optional') || hasClass(requiredInput, 'ed_button')) { - return; - } errors = checkRequiredField(requiredInput, errors); } );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
js/formidable.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
js/formidable.js (2)
170-171: LGTM! Clean conversion from jQuery to vanilla JS.
The conversion handles both jQuery and vanilla JS objects elegantly using optional chaining.
166-191: Verify error handling consistency across the codebase.
The refactored validation maintains the existing error object structure, but let's verify the error handling remains consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Error handling is consistent across the codebase
The validation maintains consistent error handling patterns:
- Uses standard
errors[fieldID]structure throughout - Consistently retrieves error messages via
getFieldValidationMessage() - Properly handles both required field messages (
data-reqmsg) and invalid field messages (data-invmsg) - Follows the same validation flow for all field types
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent error handling patterns across the codebase.
# Test: Search for error object usage patterns
rg -A 3 'errors\[.*\].*=.*'
# Test: Search for error message handling
rg -A 3 'data-reqmsg|data-invmsg'
Length of output: 40142
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Related issue https://github.com/Strategy11/formidable-pro/issues/5002
This chips away at some jQuery code. It removes a use of
.findand a use of.filter.