Skip to content

Comments

[WEB-2425] fix:changes for web-2425#5616

Merged
pushya22 merged 2 commits intopreviewfrom
fix/remove-worklog-filter
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

[WEB-2425] fix:changes for web-2425#5616
pushya22 merged 2 commits intopreviewfrom
fix/remove-worklog-filter

Conversation

@sharma01ketan
Copy link
Contributor

@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan commented Sep 16, 2024

[WEB-2425]

These are the necessary changes in plane-ce for [WEB-2425].

  • This PR removed the Worklogs filter from "Activity Filters" when Time Tracking is enabled for the respective project.
  • This PR needs to be merged before the PR-1137 those changes are dependent on these in order to work properly, otherwise they'll break.

@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan added 🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend labels Sep 16, 2024
@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan added this to the v0.23-dev milestone Sep 16, 2024
@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan self-assigned this Sep 16, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request involve the addition of a new optional property, isIntakeIssue, to the TActivityFilterRoot type definition and the ActivityFilterRoot component. This boolean property enhances the component's ability to manage and differentiate between various types of issues, specifically indicating whether an issue is classified as an intake issue. The modifications allow for more nuanced filtering capabilities within the activity management system.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/ce/components/issues/worklog/activity/filter-root.tsx Added an optional property isIntakeIssue?: boolean; to the TActivityFilterRoot type definition.
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/issue-activity/root.tsx Modified the ActivityFilterRoot component to accept the new isIntakeIssue prop.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🧹chore

Poem

In the garden of code, a new flag does bloom,
isIntakeIssue brings light to the room.
With filters more clever, we hop and we play,
Sorting through issues in a bright, bouncy way.
So let’s celebrate changes, both big and small,
For each line of code, we’re grateful to all! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45da70c and 23bb6ab.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • web/ce/components/issues/worklog/activity/filter-root.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/issue-activity/root.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
web/ce/components/issues/worklog/activity/filter-root.tsx (1)

12-12: LGTM! The addition of the isIntakeIssue property enhances filtering flexibility.

The inclusion of the optional isIntakeIssue property in the TActivityFilterRoot type definition is a good addition. It allows the component to handle specific filtering requirements for "intake" issues, providing more flexibility in accommodating complex filtering scenarios.

Please ensure that this property is properly handled within the ActivityFilterRoot component's implementation to avoid any unexpected behavior. You can use the following script to verify the usage:

Additionally, consider adding documentation or comments to clarify the purpose and usage of this property for better code readability and maintainability.

Verification successful

The isIntakeIssue property is properly implemented and used consistently across the codebase.

Based on the search results, we can confirm that the isIntakeIssue property is being used appropriately in multiple components:

  1. In web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/issue-activity/root.tsx:

    • It's defined as an optional boolean in the type definition.
    • Used as a prop with a default value of false.
    • Applied in conditional rendering: {!isIntakeIssue && (...)}.
    • Passed down to the ActivityFilterRoot component.
  2. In web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx:

    • Passed as a prop to the IssueActivity component.
  3. In web/ce/components/issues/worklog/activity/filter-root.tsx:

    • Defined as an optional boolean prop in the TActivityFilterRoot type, as initially reviewed.

The consistent usage across these components suggests that the property is well-integrated into the existing codebase, providing the intended functionality for differentiating between regular and intake issues.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `isIntakeIssue` property within the `ActivityFilterRoot` component.

# Test: Search for the usage of `isIntakeIssue` property. Expect: Proper handling within the component's implementation.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'isIntakeIssue'

Length of output: 76


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `isIntakeIssue` property within the `ActivityFilterRoot` component.

# Approach 1: Use rg without file type specification
echo "Approach 1: Generic search with rg"
rg -i 'isIntakeIssue' -A 5

# Approach 2: Use fd to find TypeScript files and grep to search
echo "Approach 2: fd and grep combination"
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -ni 'isIntakeIssue' -A 5

# Approach 3: Use ast-grep to search for isIntakeIssue usage
echo "Approach 3: ast-grep search"
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern '$_.$_($$$, { isIntakeIssue: $_ })'

Length of output: 7382

/>
)}
<ActivityFilterRoot selectedFilters={selectedFilters} toggleFilter={toggleFilter} />
<ActivityFilterRoot selectedFilters={selectedFilters} toggleFilter={toggleFilter} isIntakeIssue={isIntakeIssue}/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Unused prop in ActivityFilterRoot component

The isIntakeIssue prop is correctly defined in the ActivityFilterRoot component's prop type, but it's not being used in the component's implementation. This could lead to confusion for developers using the component.

Consider one of the following actions:

  • If the prop is intended for future use, add a TODO comment explaining its purpose.
  • If the prop is no longer needed, remove it from the component's prop type.
  • If the prop should be used, implement the necessary logic within the component.
Analysis chain

LGTM!

The isIntakeIssue prop is being passed correctly to the ActivityFilterRoot component.

Verify that the ActivityFilterRoot component is expecting and handling the new isIntakeIssue prop correctly. Run the following script to check the component implementation:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify `ActivityFilterRoot` component implementation.

# Test: Search for the component declaration and usage. Expect: `isIntakeIssue` prop should be declared and used.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'ActivityFilterRoot'

Length of output: 81


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for ActivityFilterRoot component implementation

# Find TypeScript files and search for ActivityFilterRoot
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg -n -C 5 'ActivityFilterRoot'

Length of output: 4091


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine the full implementation of ActivityFilterRoot component

# Display the entire content of the file containing ActivityFilterRoot
fd -e tsx -e ts | xargs rg -l 'export const ActivityFilterRoot' | xargs cat

Length of output: 1037

@sharma01ketan sharma01ketan changed the title [WEB-2425] fix:changes for web-2425 ce portion [WEB-2425] fix:changes for web-2425 ce Sep 17, 2024
@SatishGandham SatishGandham changed the title [WEB-2425] fix:changes for web-2425 ce [WEB-2425] fix:changes for web-2425 Sep 19, 2024
@pushya22 pushya22 merged commit e70e272 into preview Sep 19, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
6 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2025
6 tasks
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta deleted the fix/remove-worklog-filter branch July 18, 2025 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🐛bug Something isn't working 🌐frontend

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants