Skip to content

Conversation

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh commented Sep 9, 2022

Replaces #27376

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 9, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added e2e-images-update Related to images used by e2e tests vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 9, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 15, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 15, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 29, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 3, 2022
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 4, 2022

/test e2e-gcp-ovn

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 4, 2022
@soltysh soltysh changed the title [WIP] k8s 1.25.0 k8s 1.25.0 Oct 5, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 5, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Oct 5, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 7, 2022
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 10, 2022

/retest-required

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 10, 2022

/payload 4.12 ci blocking
/payload 4.12 nightly blocking

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2022

@soltysh: trigger 4 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.12

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/65a730b0-4876-11ed-9eeb-ab7610f5558c-0

trigger 6 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.12

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/65a730b0-4876-11ed-9eeb-ab7610f5558c-1

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 21, 2022

/hold cancel
all is updated with latest o/k state

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 21, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 21, 2022
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 21, 2022

/payload 4.12 ci blocking

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2022

@soltysh: trigger 4 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.12

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/dca5e7a0-5105-11ed-8cf2-f7f4d33388ef-0

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 21, 2022

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 21, 2022

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2022

@soltysh: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/08871030-5131-11ed-9ec8-ffb93fe6b39d-0

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 21, 2022

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2022

@soltysh: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/f541f350-5135-11ed-8f9b-941f214a27f2-0

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2022

@kikisdeliveryservice: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/63cc5b70-5164-11ed-9dd6-597478a2ae07-0

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2022

@kikisdeliveryservice: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/046dd9a0-518d-11ed-90c0-265a3f0e79d4-0

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kikisdeliveryservice, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

…age tests

The WaitForPod* methods has changed in kubernetes/kubernetes#109704
currently they are very strict about their expected state, so a quick
run, like in most cases in these tests where we just print usage and
complete won't likely catch running pod, so instead it's best to wait
for it to finish.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Oct 22, 2022

Manually adding lgtm label back after adding the last commit fixing image ecosystem tests (see last commit)

@soltysh soltysh added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2022
@stlaz
Copy link
Contributor

stlaz commented Oct 22, 2022

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2022

@soltysh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade 09c08c9 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi 09c08c9 link false /test e2e-gcp-csi
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-sdn 09c08c9 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi 09c08c9 link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 09c08c9 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 09c08c9 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6f17d51 into openshift:master Oct 22, 2022
@soltysh soltysh deleted the rebase-1.25.0 branch October 22, 2022 22:06
@stbenjam stbenjam mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2022
@soltysh soltysh mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. e2e-images-update Related to images used by e2e tests lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants