Skip to content

Changes for NodeTuning cluster capability#27657

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits into
openshift:masterfrom
dagrayvid:optional-node-tuning
Jan 31, 2023
Merged

Changes for NodeTuning cluster capability#27657
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits into
openshift:masterfrom
dagrayvid:optional-node-tuning

Conversation

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dagrayvid dagrayvid commented Jan 12, 2023

This PR updates the openshift/api dependency to bring in the new NodeTuning capability.

This PR also adds NodeTuning CRDs to the set that can be ignored when cluster capabilities are set to None, in test/extended/cli/explain.go. An https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_cluster-nod[…]ode-tuning-operator-master-e2e-aws-ovn/1603285604148187136 can be seen in the pending NTO PR#524.

See also the pending CVO PR which depends on this change.

$ go get github.com/openshift/api@5ad311dde2264b659a256a17c27f1836fb50e85d
$ go mod tidy
$ go mod vendor
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from deads2k and soltysh January 12, 2023 21:08
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jan 12, 2023
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @wking

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from wking January 12, 2023 21:38
Comment thread test/extended/cli/explain.go
@dagrayvid dagrayvid force-pushed the optional-node-tuning branch from 02be4fe to 8d7b85a Compare January 13, 2023 01:23
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I don't want to smash "/retest" unnecessarily and it looks like these tests are failing on other open PRs as well.

@wking, @deads2k I think this PR is ready for review.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@wking wking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cluster-bot run, via:

test e2e 4.13,openshift/origin#27657,openshift/cluster-version-operator#883,openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator#524 aws,no-capabilities

gives:

$ curl -s https://storage.googleapis.com/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-launch-aws-modern/1615473375369498624/build-log.txt | grep 'oc explain should contain proper spec'
started: 1/37/414 "[sig-cli] oc explain should contain proper spec+status for CRDs [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
passed: (27.1s) 2023-01-17T23:23:09 "[sig-cli] oc explain should contain proper spec+status for CRDs [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 18, 2023
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/assign @pweil-

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/assign @bparees

As you are aware of the plans to make NTO optional

@bparees
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bparees commented Jan 24, 2023

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 24, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, dagrayvid, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 24, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 46433a0 and 2 for PR HEAD 8d7b85a in total

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The failing e2e-gcp- tests are related to the issues on build04, being tracked in OHSS-18195

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 64ba42b and 1 for PR HEAD 8d7b85a in total

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 75cc70b and 0 for PR HEAD 8d7b85a in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/hold

Revision 8d7b85a was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 27, 2023
@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I'm seeing this same failure for ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade in other pending PRs, it does not seem related to this change.

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7e728ca and 2 for PR HEAD 8d7b85a in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 56b7201 and 1 for PR HEAD 8d7b85a in total

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bparees @wking, given that the e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade failure seems unrelated to this change, what do you think about overriding e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade for this PR?

This was done for the 1.26 rebase, and openshift/origin #27679. Context in this thread and this bug.

@bparees
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bparees commented Jan 31, 2023

opened https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-6796

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 31, 2023

@bparees: Overrode contexts on behalf of bparees: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

Details

In response to this:

opened https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-6796

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dagrayvid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The e2e-gcp-ovn failure is a known cluster-monitoring-operator issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-3923

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants