WIP - single node serial workflow by omertuc · Pull Request #16290 · openshift/release

omertuc · 2021-02-25T15:02:14Z

(Previously was called WIP - single node serial and upgrade workflows but upgrade flow was moved to this PR)

Please ignore this for now.

(This change isn't really currently specific to the MCO, I just chose MCO arbitrarily because it had an existing openshift-e2e-aws-serial job I wanted to copy)

omertuc · 2021-03-01T10:45:37Z

/test pj-rehearse

omertuc · 2021-03-01T12:49:59Z

/test pj-rehearse

omertuc · 2021-03-01T14:39:12Z

/test pj-rehearse

omertuc · 2021-03-01T16:51:59Z

/test pj-rehearse

omertuc · 2021-03-01T19:14:09Z

/test pj-rehearse

vrutkovs · 2021-04-07T16:40:52Z

Reference: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-379

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-04-07T17:09:15Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: omertuc
To complete the pull request process, please assign yuqi-zhang after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @yuqi-zhang in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

ingvagabund · 2021-04-15T07:52:48Z

@omertuc can you please rebase the PR to get the latest failing tests?

ingvagabund · 2021-04-19T08:11:55Z

[BeforeEach] PodTopologySpread Filtering
  k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.20.0/test/e2e/scheduling/predicates.go:788
STEP: Trying to get 2 available nodes which can run pod

ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/master/e2e-aws-single-node-serial is running tests from openshift-4.7 branch, not the master branch.

The BeforeEach in the master branch is expected to be reported at line 720.

omertuc · 2021-04-19T08:38:36Z

[BeforeEach] PodTopologySpread Filtering
  k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.20.0/test/e2e/scheduling/predicates.go:788
STEP: Trying to get 2 available nodes which can run pod
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/master/e2e-aws-single-node-serial is running tests from openshift-4.7 branch, not the master branch.

The BeforeEach in the master branch is expected to be reported at line 720.

Odd, I'll look into it. Nice catch.

EDIT: Not sure what's causing this, I'm not doing anything special other than changing the TEST_SUITE. Tried rebasing again.

omertuc · 2021-04-19T11:18:43Z

/retest

since openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator#1122 was merged

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-04-19T11:18:56Z

@omertuc: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

/test ci-secret-bootstrap-config-validation
/test app-ci-config-dry
/test boskos-config
/test boskos-config-generation
/test build01-dry
/test build02-dry
/test ci-operator-config
/test ci-operator-config-metadata
/test ci-operator-registry
/test ci-secret-generator-config
/test ci-testgrid-allow-list
/test config
/test core-dry
/test core-valid
/test correctly-sharded-config
/test deprecate-templates
/test generated-config
/test generated-dashboards
/test ordered-prow-config
/test owners
/test pj-rehearse
/test prow-config
/test prow-config-filenames
/test prow-config-semantics
/test release-config
/test release-controller-config
/test secret-generator-config-valid
/test services-valid
/test step-registry-metadata
/test step-registry-shellcheck
/test vsphere-dry
/test pylint
/test yamllint

Use /test all to run the following jobs:

pull-ci-openshift-release-ci-secret-bootstrap-config-validation
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-app-ci-config-dry
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-boskos-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-boskos-config-generation
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-build01-dry
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-build02-dry
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-operator-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-operator-config-metadata
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-operator-registry
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-secret-generator-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-core-dry
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-core-valid
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-correctly-sharded-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-deprecate-templates
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-generated-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-generated-dashboards
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-ordered-prow-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-owners
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-pj-rehearse
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-prow-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-prow-config-filenames
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-prow-config-semantics
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-release-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-release-controller-config
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-secret-generator-config-valid
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-services-valid
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-step-registry-metadata
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-step-registry-shellcheck
pull-ci-openshift-release-master-vsphere-dry
pull-ci-openshift-release-yamllint

Details

In response to this:

/retest since openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator#1122 was merged

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

omertuc · 2021-04-19T11:20:13Z

/retest

ingvagabund · 2021-04-19T12:50:19Z

openshift/origin#26054 needs to merge first

ingvagabund · 2021-05-12T08:57:55Z

@omertuc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934085#c8 for the sig-scheduling tests. Some are still failing but the underlying reason is different. image-registry needs to create only a single instance of the pod instead of two. The issue is tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/IR-181.

ingvagabund · 2021-06-30T11:07:50Z

@omertuc can you rebase the PR? To see the latest failing tests (if any)?

omertuc · 2021-06-30T13:06:05Z

/retest

omertuc · 2021-06-30T14:32:44Z

/retest

omertuc · 2021-06-30T19:46:13Z

@omertuc can you rebase the PR? To see the latest failing tests (if any)?

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/16290/rehearse-16290-pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-aws-single-node-serial/1410245257366343680

omertuc · 2021-06-30T19:46:21Z

/retest

kikisdeliveryservice · 2021-06-30T20:14:45Z

why did you change the contents of the next test to always_run:true?

can you clean this up so that you add your stuff with a completely new entry beginning with a new -agent

Just bad rebase, didn't mean to. Should be better now

openshift-ci · 2021-06-30T22:39:00Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: omertuc
To complete the pull request process, please ask for approval from kikisdeliveryservice after the PR has been reviewed.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

kikisdeliveryservice · 2021-06-30T22:43:58Z

looks good, @omertuc

a little confused, do you want this e2e in this repo? initial message seems to say it's a test. ping me if/when you want approval & remove WIP. 😄

omertuc · 2021-06-30T23:19:16Z

looks good, @omertuc

a little confused, do you want this e2e in this repo? initial message seems to say it's a test. ping me if/when you want approval & remove WIP. 😄

It is just a WIP test, just didn't want to leave the ci-operator/jobs file messed up

romfreiman · 2021-07-01T07:09:34Z

@omertuc so lets add the serial job to the test grid of sno 4.9?

omertuc · 2021-07-01T10:11:33Z

@omertuc so lets add the serial job to the test grid of sno 4.9?

@romfreiman
kubernetes/test-infra#22757
#19878

openshift-ci · 2021-11-24T00:09:04Z

@omertuc: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/master/e2e-aws-upgrade-single-node	52aa919e11ff12cfde1e287e096828b39103df84	link	`/test pj-rehearse`
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/master/e2e-aws-upgrade	2d654f74d8752a449daa860a928a5038e756cb84	link	`/test pj-rehearse`
ci/rehearse/openshift/machine-config-operator/master/e2e-aws-single-node-serial	`28371e7`	link	`/test pj-rehearse`
ci/prow/pj-rehearse	`28371e7`	link	`/test pj-rehearse`
ci/build-farm/build04-dry	`28371e7`	link	true	`/test build04-dry`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci · 2021-11-24T00:09:10Z

@omertuc: PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

omertuc · 2021-11-24T10:03:34Z

Obsoleted by #19878 , closing

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 25, 2021

openshift-ci-robot requested review from kikisdeliveryservice and sinnykumari February 25, 2021 15:02

omertuc force-pushed the sno-serial-upgrade branch from 4163c4b to ce913b7 Compare February 25, 2021 15:06

omertuc force-pushed the sno-serial-upgrade branch 2 times, most recently from 24a1909 to 52aa919 Compare April 6, 2021 08:42

vrutkovs reviewed Apr 7, 2021

View reviewed changes

Comment thread ...p-registry/openshift/upgrade/aws/single-node/openshift-upgrade-aws-single-node-workflow.yaml Outdated

vrutkovs mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2021

Add SNO upgrade workflows #17519

Merged

2 tasks

omertuc changed the title ~~WIP - single node serial and upgrade workflows~~ WIP - single node serial workflow Apr 7, 2021

omertuc force-pushed the sno-serial-upgrade branch from 52aa919 to 2c1e10d Compare April 7, 2021 17:07

ingvagabund mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2021

bug 1934085: UPSTREAM: 100128: [sig-scheduling] SchedulerPreemption|SchedulerPredicates|SchedulerPriorities: adjust some e2e tests to run in a single node cluster scenario openshift/kubernetes#665

Merged

openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 15, 2021

omertuc force-pushed the sno-serial-upgrade branch from 2c1e10d to 1fbac2a Compare April 16, 2021 10:05

openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 16, 2021

omertuc force-pushed the sno-serial-upgrade branch from 1fbac2a to bb6d1dd Compare April 19, 2021 09:56

openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 12, 2021

omertuc force-pushed the sno-serial-upgrade branch from bb6d1dd to 2d654f7 Compare June 30, 2021 11:19

openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 30, 2021

kikisdeliveryservice suggested changes Jun 30, 2021

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot assigned kikisdeliveryservice Jun 30, 2021

WIP - single node serial workflow

28371e7

omertuc force-pushed the sno-serial-upgrade branch from 2d654f7 to 28371e7 Compare June 30, 2021 22:38

openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 24, 2021

omertuc closed this Nov 24, 2021

Conversation

omertuc commented Feb 25, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Mar 1, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Mar 1, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Mar 1, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Mar 1, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Mar 1, 2021

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Apr 7, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 7, 2021

Uh oh!

ingvagabund commented Apr 15, 2021

Uh oh!

ingvagabund commented Apr 19, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Apr 19, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Apr 19, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 19, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Apr 19, 2021

Uh oh!

ingvagabund commented Apr 19, 2021

Uh oh!

ingvagabund commented May 12, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ingvagabund commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

kikisdeliveryservice Jun 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

omertuc Jun 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

kikisdeliveryservice commented Jun 30, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

romfreiman commented Jul 1, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Jul 1, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 24, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 24, 2021

Uh oh!

omertuc commented Nov 24, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

omertuc commented Feb 25, 2021 •

edited

Loading

ingvagabund commented Apr 19, 2021 •

edited

Loading

omertuc commented Apr 19, 2021 •

edited

Loading

omertuc commented Apr 19, 2021 •

edited

Loading

ingvagabund commented May 12, 2021 •

edited

Loading

kikisdeliveryservice commented Jun 30, 2021 •

edited

Loading