Restyle Added a reference to dvc cache dir in shared-development-server page#1321
Closed
restyled-io[bot] wants to merge 8 commits into
Closed
Restyle Added a reference to dvc cache dir in shared-development-server page#1321restyled-io[bot] wants to merge 8 commits into
restyled-io[bot] wants to merge 8 commits into
Conversation
abed4c1 to
e6be4ea
Compare
|
Comparing Restyle Added a reference to dvc cache dir in shared-development-server page Snapshot #5 to median since last deploy of DVC.org.
3 pages tested
|
| Chrome Desktop | MotoG4, 3G connection |
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
Most significant changes
![]() |
Value | Budget |
|---|---|---|
| Total JSON size in bytes Chrome Desktop |
7.4 KB from 37 KB |
|
| Lighthouse Performance Score MotoG4, 3G connection |
88 from 76 |
Docs
Browser previews
| Chrome Desktop | MotoG4, 3G connection |
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
Most significant changes
![]() |
Value | Budget |
|---|---|---|
| Total JSON size in bytes Chrome Desktop |
58 KB from 160 KB |
|
| Total JSON size in bytes MotoG4, 3G connection |
14 KB from 28 KB |
|
| Total Page size in bytes Chrome Desktop |
1.2 MB from 1.3 MB |
Blog
Browser previews
| Chrome Desktop | MotoG4, 3G connection |
|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
Most significant changes
![]() |
Value | Budget |
|---|---|---|
| Total JSON size in bytes Chrome Desktop |
69 KB from 130 KB |
|
| Total JSON size in bytes MotoG4, 3G connection |
69 KB from 91 KB |
Calibre: Site dashboard | View this PR | Edit settings
e6be4ea to
342736d
Compare
342736d to
885f543
Compare
885f543 to
4113282
Compare
Contributor
|
Hmmm this is strange. I thought Restyled used to make PRs into PR branches (meta) but this is going straight to master. In this case the original PR (#1316) is from an outside contributor so maybe that's the reason? Same problem with #1329 and #1319. #1310 in contrast worked properly, as a PR into the feature branch (inside the upstream). Cc @shcheklein |
Contributor
|
p.s. opened #1330 about this. I think I'm going to close all this bad Restyled PRs for now and explain the situation to the contributors. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.







A duplicate of #1316 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.
Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.
The following Restylers made fixes:
To incorporate these changes, you can either:
Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or
Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
the original Pull Request
Expand for example instructions
NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.
Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.