Skip to content

add beta.21 upgrade guide#146

Merged
Adammatthiesen merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
beta.21
Jul 23, 2025
Merged

add beta.21 upgrade guide#146
Adammatthiesen merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
beta.21

Conversation

@Adammatthiesen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Adammatthiesen Adammatthiesen commented Jul 23, 2025

Description

  • Closes #
  • What does this PR change? Give us a brief description.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new upgrade guide for version 0.1.0-beta.21, including details on recent bug fixes, a breaking change related to password hashing, and important upgrade instructions.
    • Guide features improved navigation, metadata, and helpful references for further configuration and plugin documentation.
    • Removed the "NEW" badge from the sidebar of the 0.1.0-beta.20 upgrade guide.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Walkthrough

A new upgrade guide document for StudioCMS version 0.1.0-beta.21 was added, detailing bug fixes and a breaking change regarding password hashing. The subproject dependency for studiocms was also updated to a new commit reference. Additionally, the "NEW" badge was removed from the sidebar metadata of the 0.1.0-beta.20 upgrade guide. No other changes were made.

Changes

File(s) / Path(s) Change Summary
src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-21.mdx Added new upgrade guide for StudioCMS 0.1.0-beta.21 with metadata, bug fixes, breaking change notes, and UI imports.
src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-20.mdx Removed "NEW" badge with "success" variant from sidebar metadata of the 0.1.0-beta.20 upgrade guide.
studiocms (subproject reference) Updated subproject commit reference from 029a22d... to 6816ab....

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Docs
    participant StudioCMS

    User->>Docs: Accesses upgrade guide for 0.1.0-beta.21
    Docs->>User: Displays bug fixes and breaking change notice
    User->>StudioCMS: Updates StudioCMS and applies password update as advised
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • add beta.20 guide #142: Both PRs add new upgrade guide documents for consecutive beta versions (0.1.0-beta.20 and 0.1.0-beta.21) with similar structure and content focus, indicating a direct continuation in documenting version upgrades.
  • update docs for beta17 #127: Both PRs modify upgrade guide documents and sidebar metadata badges for different beta versions, including adding new guides and removing "NEW" badges from earlier versions.

Suggested labels

i18n

Poem

🐇
A guide hops in with news so bright,
Beta twenty-one takes flight!
Bugs are fixed, a hash anew,
Docs updated just for you.
With every hop, the code grows strong—
Upgrade now, it won’t take long!
🥕

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation - Beta

CodeRabbit's unit test generation is now available in Beta! Automatically generate comprehensive unit tests for your code changes, ensuring better test coverage and catching edge cases you might miss. Our AI analyzes your code structure and creates tests that follow best practices and your project's testing patterns. Learn more here, or just try it under ✨ Finishing Touches.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9c57bb and 3fd9976.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-20.mdx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-20.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run Starlight Link Check
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch beta.21

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@studiocms-no-reply
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

studiocms-no-reply commented Jul 23, 2025

Lunaria Status Overview

🌕 This pull request will trigger status changes.

Learn more

By default, every PR changing files present in the Lunaria configuration's files property will be considered and trigger status changes accordingly.

You can change this by adding one of the keywords present in the ignoreKeywords property in your Lunaria configuration file in the PR's title (ignoring all files) or by including a tracker directive in the merged commit's description.

Tracked Files

File Note
en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-20.mdx Source changed, localizations will be marked as outdated.
en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-21.mdx Localization added, will be marked as complete.
Warnings reference
Icon Description
🔄️ The source for this localization has been updated since the creation of this pull request, make sure all changes in the source have been applied.

@Adammatthiesen Adammatthiesen marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2025 22:30
@Adammatthiesen Adammatthiesen requested a review from a team as a code owner July 23, 2025 22:30
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-21.mdx (2)

21-22: Polish wording & casing in the single bullet point
Small editorial tweaks improve readability and keep style consistent with the other upgrade guides (sentence-case, parallel wording, abbreviations in code-font where appropriate).

-- Implement fixes for First-time-setup, auth API routes and css for font, and markdown pageType config.
+- Fixes for first-time setup, authentication API routes, font CSS, and Markdown `pageType` configuration.

23-25: Use fully-qualified version strings for clarity
Elsewhere in the docs we prefix version tags with the full semver (e.g. 0.1.0-beta.16). Updating the aside maintains consistency and avoids confusion between branches with the same beta number.

-Please note that in `beta.16` we introduced a breaking change with the password hashing algorithm. While previous passwords will still work, we recommend that users update their passwords after upgrading to `beta.21`.
+Please note that in `0.1.0-beta.16` we introduced a breaking change with the password-hashing algorithm. While existing passwords still work, we recommend users update their passwords after upgrading to `0.1.0-beta.21`.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb34c88 and c9c57bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-21.mdx (1 hunks)
  • studiocms (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ArmandPhilippot
PR: withstudiocms/docs#140
File: src/content/docs/fr/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-19.mdx:24-24
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T12:16:32.374Z
Learning: In the withstudiocms/docs repository, documentation URLs in the package-catalog may maintain legacy path names for stability and consistency across language versions, even when the actual package names have been updated. Always verify that corresponding files exist before flagging URLs as broken.
src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-21.mdx (1)

Learnt from: ArmandPhilippot
PR: #140
File: src/content/docs/fr/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-19.mdx:24-24
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T12:16:32.374Z
Learning: In the withstudiocms/docs repository, documentation URLs in the package-catalog may maintain legacy path names for stability and consistency across language versions, even when the actual package names have been updated. Always verify that corresponding files exist before flagging URLs as broken.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
studiocms (1)

1-1: Confirm the submodule pointer is pinned to the official v0.1.0-beta.21 release tag.

The hash 6816ab0 looks plausible, but without an explicit tag reference we can’t be sure this commit won’t be force-moved or replaced.
Please double-check that:

  1. The referenced commit is the exact commit tagged as v0.1.0-beta.21 (or the SHA of the annotated tag);
  2. A lightweight tag or branch move will not break reproducible builds for downstream consumers.

If it isn’t the release tag, consider retargeting the submodule to the tag itself rather than an arbitrary SHA.

src/content/docs/en/guides/upgrade/version-guides/0-1-0-beta-21.mdx (1)

27-34: Run link checker before merge
Several reference links ([image-service], [web-vitals-guide], etc.) rely on legacy paths that occasionally change. A quick npm run check:links (or equivalent) will catch any drift introduced since the last release.

@Adammatthiesen Adammatthiesen merged commit 2fce9e3 into main Jul 23, 2025
8 checks passed
@Adammatthiesen Adammatthiesen deleted the beta.21 branch July 23, 2025 23:23
ArmandPhilippot added a commit to ArmandPhilippot/studiocms-docs that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
dreyfus92 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
See #142 and #146

Co-authored-by: Paul Valladares <85648028+dreyfus92@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants